Don't get me wrong, I believe in life and evolution and constant change and the expanding universe, it's just fun to play with ideas that make theoretical sense for a week or two.
Even if life were an A.I program that wouldn't mean it doesn't live, and it's clear that different lifeforms thrive as authentically indicated through difference.
The Doctor on Star Trek: Voyager spends multiple episodes defending his consciousness.
Data on STNG as well (it's a recurring theme throughout science-fiction).
UFO takes a look at math and how it can be used to communicate, and how certain numbers like the Fine-Structure Constant regularly appear in nature for unknown reasons.
The film points out how the Fine-Structure Constant appears in the fundamental building blocks of the universe (air for instance), it's regular occurrence genuinely noteworthy from inquisitive points of view.
If the same piece of a fundamental formula consistently appears in different phenomena, the argument could be made that it was placed there by creative entities universally exploring.
That it indeed was fundamental to the sustainability of life and miraculously created to organically uplift it.
It could have also been randomly generated through the infinite interactions of endless time and space, the eventual emergence of a complex pattern gradually generated through interstellar ages.
It would still be interesting to know more about A.I and how the programs are technologically crafted, do they embrace form and content for instance, and could such features represent body and spirit?
Are there specific codes like the Fine-Structure Constant consistently used when generating A.I?
Or can different codes generate similar worlds?
Like different cultures emerging around the globe.
Makes for great science-fiction either way, as Star Trek and other narratives relate.
Integral artistic expression.
Having taken on so much variety.
*It's a cool film if you like sci-fi and stories that revolve around learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment